Post by account_disabled on Dec 20, 2023 0:06:29 GMT -5
Even Chile could incorporate this concept into its new constitution. ? For example I'm thinking about the needs of the Mapuche people in Patagonia. Not long ago I visited the Indian community of Quilmes with some friends in Tucumán. One of the questions we asked them was about the community's connection to the Argentinian nation-state and they told us they had a relationship to the Argentine nation but that they had their own authority and culture. It is produced in different regions of the country, not only in the south.
There are signs of identity movements that have political reson Job Function Email List ance and are even accompanied by political struggles in some cases. You point out that the changes in representation in Latin America over the past twenty or thirty years are the product of the so-called progressive wave of governments whose symbols are the flags of the great homeland and even the introduction of indigenous peoples. As an actor, the name Central has a long history as an aspiration. It has a history of more than twenty or thirty years. And those movement issues that claim we have to speak for ourselves do not reflect progressive politics.
The influence of governments rather precedes progressive governments and in some cases claims their language or culture against progressives eager to represent them. So there are interlocking dynamics. There is no doubt that the emergence of different left-wing governments has strengthened the awareness of these long-marginalized peoples but this did not happen once these movements came to power. The fact that they reach the government only promotes the development of indigenous peoples. Is the desire for Latin American integration just a banner of the left? Could it be that it also comes from the right.
There are signs of identity movements that have political reson Job Function Email List ance and are even accompanied by political struggles in some cases. You point out that the changes in representation in Latin America over the past twenty or thirty years are the product of the so-called progressive wave of governments whose symbols are the flags of the great homeland and even the introduction of indigenous peoples. As an actor, the name Central has a long history as an aspiration. It has a history of more than twenty or thirty years. And those movement issues that claim we have to speak for ourselves do not reflect progressive politics.
The influence of governments rather precedes progressive governments and in some cases claims their language or culture against progressives eager to represent them. So there are interlocking dynamics. There is no doubt that the emergence of different left-wing governments has strengthened the awareness of these long-marginalized peoples but this did not happen once these movements came to power. The fact that they reach the government only promotes the development of indigenous peoples. Is the desire for Latin American integration just a banner of the left? Could it be that it also comes from the right.